Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:02
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Anthony Richardson sidelined by shoulder injury - NBC Sports
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
It has been said that people with ADHD can often hyperfocus. Can that be an advantage?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
New rabies cases detected in SLO County. How to avoid deadly disease - San Luis Obispo Tribune
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Accidental discovery at New York planetarium unlocks secret into universe’s inner workings - PBS
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
'Where's our money?' CDC grant funding is moving so slowly layoffs are happening - NPR
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Is UnitedHealth a Millionaire Maker? - Yahoo Finance
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Quantum embezzlement is hiding in known one-dimensional materials: Study - Interesting Engineering
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What historical event or person have you surprised hasn't been made into a Hollywood movie yet?